On this page:
Your choice of car can make all the diference if you are involved in a crash. Our Used Car Safety Ratings provide you with a crash safety rating that shows how well each vehicle protects its driver from death or serious injury in a crash.
So if you are thinking of buying a car, check out its safety rating. There are lots of safe, less expensive cars to choose from. In fact, some of the most affordable used cars are among the safest.
Some vehicles can significantly reduce your chance of being seriously injured in a crash, and even can help avoid a crash altogether. Your vehicle also needs to offer good protection to other road users, such as people walking and cycling, if it collides with them.
Vehicles identified as a 'Safer Pick' provide excellent protection to their own driver, cause less serious injury to other drivers, pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists in a collision, and have a lower risk of being involved in a crash, including reversing crashes.
The Used Car Safety Ratings show that, on average, newer models provide their drivers with better protection from injury in a crash. These improvements come from better structural designs, an increase in the fitting of safety features such as front, side, curtain and knee airbags, more advanced seat belt systems and vehicle interiors built with more energy-absorbing materials.
Another consistent trend is that there is significant variation in the ratings within vehicle categories, even between vehicle models of the same age. And some vehicle models, including recent ones, provide good protection for their drivers but present a high risk of injury to other road users in a crash. The Used Car Safety Ratings assist buyers to select vehicle models that provide the best protection for all road users including themselves.
These ratings are based on the latest real world crash data. Many new vehicle models and vehicles with low sales are not covered in these ratings because there is not enough information to accurately rate them.
Buyers considering a new or late model vehicle, particularly in the light and small categories, should check the ANCAP safety ratings and look for a vehicle which holds the maximum 5 star ANCAP safety rating.
MYTH: You can take more risks if you've got a vehicle with safety features - they will save you in a crash.
FACT: While safety features are more likely to increase your chances of surviving a crash, they don't make you indestructible. Safety features won't necessarily save you from death or serious injury, particularly at higher speeds or if you're impaired or not wearing your seat belt.
MYTH: A safe vehicle is more expensive.
FACT: Many reasonably priced vehicle models score very well in the safety ratings and better than some of the more expensive models.
MYTH: Older vehicles tend to be bigger and heavier, and therefore safer.
FACT: Older vehicles are shown from crash records to be less safe on average than newer vehicles, due to fewer safety features and less sophisticated design.
Safety ratings are created by using records from over 8 million vehicles involved in police-reported road crashes. The vehicle's size and weight, design, and safety features it has, such as airbags and types of seat belts, are all taken into account.
The Driver Protection Ratings show the risk of death or serious injury resulting in hospital admission to the driver of the vehicle in a crash. This ratings does not assess the risk of being involved in the crash in the first place, which can be influenced by vehicle technology, driver behaviour, vehicle condition and the road environment. Factors such as who drives these vehicles or where they are driven were taken into account when analysing the data.
The Driver Protection Ratings have been adjusted for factors such as driver gender and age, type of road user, speed limit, number of vehicles involved and the year and location of crash.
Additional ratings are calculated that estimate the injury risk the vehicle poses to other road users in a crash and the likelihood of being involved in a crash based on the crash avoidance features fitted. These ratings are used along with the Driver Protection Rating to designate vehicles as a 'Safer Pick'.
The 'Safer Pick' vehicles have been identified from the Total Safety Rating for each model that combines driver protection as well as harm to other road users in a crash as well as only recommending vehicles available with Electronic Stability Control. Why?
The total safety rating identifies how well individual vehicle models protect ALL road users from injury in the event of a crash, including cyclists, pedestrians, motorcyclists and drivers of other vehicles. This is a better guide to the TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPACT of vehicle safety.
The crashworthiness of a light vehicle is relevant to injury outcome in around 90% of crashes in Australasia whilst vehicle aggressivity is relevant to injury outcome in around 55% of crashes. Consequently the total crash safety rating is weighted more highly towards the crashworthiness performance than aggressivity performance of each vehicle. This also means that the estimated total safety rating correlates more closely with the crashworthiness estimates of the vehicle rather than the aggressivity estimates.
If we are serious about reducing road trauma, we need to consider how any vehicle we purchase protects ALL road users, not just its own occupants. Vehicles identified as a 'Safer Pick' provide best possible injury protection to all road users including their own occupants.
Electronic Stability Control is a crash avoidance technology that has been proven to be effective in a number of studies internationally. Vehicles are only recommended as a 'Safer Pick' if Electronic Stability Control is available on that model. For some vehicle models Electronic Stability Control will be only available on certain variants or as an option. The 'Safer Pick' only applies to vehicles fitted with Electronic Stability Control.
These ratings are produced to help people in the market who are buying a used car identify the safest models. Armed with this information, consumers can also place pressure on importers and dealers to encourage them to sell and promote safer vehicles. People are encouraged to use this guide to help them choose the safest possible car for the money they have available.
If all vehicles were fitted with the latest vehicle safety features, the number of fatal and disabling crash injuries could be significantly reduced.
Safety features that may significantly reduce the risk of death or serious injury in the event of a crash include:
These ratings cover the majority of popular passenger vehicles and light commercial vehicles. The rated vehicles have been classified into 10 categories, comprising 4 categories of regular passenger car, 3 categories of Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV), 2 categories of light commercial vehicle, and 1 category of people movers.
These ratings are calculated from the outcomes of actual crashes using statistical methods. The more often a particular vehicle model is involved in a crash, the more accurate will be the rating for that vehicle.
This means that, in general, the ratings for more common and/or older vehicles may be more accurate than ratings for newer and/or less common models. Only vehicles with a specified minimum number of crash involvements and where the rating meets minimum accuracy criteria are included. The rating category given to a vehicle reflects the estimated average risk of death or serious injury in a crash as well as the level of statistical confidence in the estimate.
Vehicles with limited real world crash experience and hence limited statistical confidence in the rating estimate tend to be late vehicle models that have only been on sale for a short time before the end of the data period on which the ratings are based. Ratings for these vehicles will possibly change in future updates as more crash data become available. Vehicles with a high degree of uncertainty in the ratings have been excluded.
Any vehicle safety rating system can only provide an indication of how much protection a vehicle is likely to offer a driver in the event of a crash, or how much harm it is likely to cause the driver of another vehicle. Whether or not death or serious injury results also depends on how safely the vehicle is driven and the particular circumstances of the crash.
ANCAP safety ratings are assessed by a combination of data obtained from the simulation of common crash scenarios undertaken on new vehicles in a controlled laboratory setting, the features that can help the vehicles avoid a crash or better protect their occupants in a crash, and the risk the vehicles pose to pedestrians in a crash. Used Car Safety Ratings are calculated using data from millions of police reports on actual crashes involving a range of drivers and all types of driving conditions.
The Used Car Safety Ratings are all calculated on a consistent set of criteria and all updated annually based on the most recent real world data. They can therefore be compared across all categories. The Used Car Safety Ratings 'Safer Pick' further identifies vehicles that provide the best protection for both their own drivers and other road users in a crash and are fitted with ESC.
Any vehicle safety rating system can only provide an indication of the relative levels of protection between vehicles you can expect in the event of a crash. Whether or not you die or are seriously injured in a crash also depends on how safely you drive your vehicle and the circumstances of each particular crash.
Here is a summary of the differences between the two types of ratings:
|New Car Safety Ratings||Used Car Safety Ratings|
|1||Determined by crash testing vehicles in a controlled laboratory setting||Calculated using data from police reports on actual crashes|
|2||Consider only certain crash configurations - offset frontal, side impact, pole crashes and pedestrian impacts||Consider all crash types|
|3||Consider both the ability of the vehicle to protect occupants and pedestrians from injury in a crash as well as the presence of certain safety features such as seatbelt reminder systems, ESC and other driver assist technologies in the rating||Rate only the ability of a vehicle to protect people involved in the crash from injury. The presence of vehicle crash avoidance features is not considered in the ratings apart from the Best Picks being restricted to those vehicles available with Electronic Stability Control|
|4||Considers injury protection of the vehicle's own occupants in the rating and pedestrian protection||Considers the injury protection of road users inside the vehicle and all potential collision partners including other vehicle occupant, pedestrians, motorcyclists and bicyclists|
|5||Do not reflect the role of vehicle mass in determining injury outcomes in a crash hence ratings cannot be directly compared across vehicles of different mass.||Do reflect the role of vehicle mass in determining injury outcomes in a crash hence ratings can be directly compared across all vehicles.|
These differences in the ratings can lead to differences in the assessment of some vehicles.
Any vehicle safety rating system can only provide an indication of the relative levels of protection between vehicles you can expect in the event of a crash. Whether or not you die or are seriously injured in a crash also depends on how safely you drive your vehicle.
To find out more about used car safety ratings, read our brochure. (pdf 2.7mb)
These ratings compare vehicles with the rest of the vehicle fleet, not against a fixed standard. That means that there will always be vehicles that rate good or bad. Therefore, it is not possible to objectively assess, from these ratings, the overall safety standard of the New Zealand or Australian vehicle fleets. They have not been compared with vehicle fleets from other countries for the same reason.
These factors were taken into account as much as possible when the data were analysed. The ratings were adjusted for factors such as driver gender and age, type of road user involved, speed limit at the crash location, number of vehicles involved, crash configuration, and year and location of crash. As far as possible the ratings are about the contribution of the vehicle to injury outcomes in a crash and not who was driving the vehicle or where it crashed.
Crashes in even the best-rated vehicles can still result in serious injury or death to the driver. The best protection against injury is to drive safely and encourage other road users to drive safely. When people are ready to buy another vehicle, they should take these ratings into account and consider choosing one of the best-rated models.
On average, newer models provide their occupants with better protection in a crash but a number of less expensive models do rate well. People should work out what they can afford to spend on a used car and consider choosing one of the best-rated vehicles that their budget allows.
These ratings rate vehicles against each other, not against any fixed standard. This means that there will always be vehicles that are rated average, above average and below average. So, although some vehicle models offer better protection to drivers in a crash than others, this does not mean that the less safe models are dangerous to the extent they should be taken off the roads. All vehicles must meet local design standards for safety before they can be made available for sale.
Newer vehicles are usually safer than older ones.
They provide more protection in a crash as they use high strength materials and have features like airbags, improved impact crumple zones and collapsible steering columns. More and more vehicles are also being fitted with features that can help avoid a crash or reduce the severity if a crash does occur. These safety features include:
In many used cars these features are optional or available only in some variants. It makes sense to choose the car that has the best driver protection rating but also the greatest number of safety features fitted as they can reduce your risk of death and serious injury in the event of a crash, or can even prevent a crash in the first place. ESC and AEB have been shown to be especially effective in helping to prevent crashes.
The Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC) has been conducting research into issues relating to vehicle safety for more than 25 years.
It began developing consumer advice on vehicle safety based on mass crash data in 1990. The same year, the NSW Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) and National Roads and Motorists' Association (NRMA) independently set out on a joint project to develop a car safety rating system based on police records of crashes. By 1991 they had produced a relative ranking of vehicles.
In mid 1991, the two groups began to work together and combine their data into one vehicle safety rating system. The creation of the Used Car Safety Ratings resulted from that work.
The UCSRs are the main output from the Vehicle Safety Research Group research program. There have been a number of highlights over the 24 years of publication in refining and extending the ratings.
The focus of the VSRG program has become much broader than just the ratings. Key areas of vehicle safety explored by the program include assessment of vehicle safety technologies, modelling and projection of vehicle fleet composition and its effects on safety, estimating crash risk, consideration of the safety implications of vehicle choice on high risk road user groups and examining the relationship between ANCAP and real world crash outcomes.
Some specific outcomes of the Group are: